Comments on: Times New Roman Isn’t Evil

By: Devlin Hogg

Devlin Hogg — Sat, 22 Oct 2005 11:36:49 +0000

Personally, I love the serif fonts. It helps make sites look more original. I hope people will soon realise that these fonts are hot. =D

By: Mark

Mark — Fri, 21 Oct 2005 19:13:52 +0000

Your site is very beautiful, but I disagree about Times New Roman :D. Bit of a stick in the mud I’m afraid… I don’t even use it for my word-processed printed documents any more!

By: Bojan

Bojan — Sat, 15 Oct 2005 08:45:07 +0000

Ah, I've always loved that Soundgarden site. The font-size is a bit too small for my liking, though. I especially love their index page.

By: Å ime

Å ime — Fri, 14 Oct 2005 19:08:00 +0000

Times isn’t evil at all. I always liked it — it’s just so plain and that makes it cool: example. It adds something to page. Yes I know it’s way old, and then Times was maybe the only safe serif font :)

By: Bojan

Bojan — Tue, 11 Oct 2005 17:24:42 +0000

I’ll just use this space to apologize for the recent downtime. My host is making some heavy changes, so hopefully everything will be more stable soon.

By: Bojan

Bojan — Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:55:02 +0000

The re-design? Well, you’ll just have to wait and see I guess :)

By: alen

alen — Tue, 11 Oct 2005 09:20:40 +0000

I agree about not so evil nature of Times New Roman. It is very readable font. After all, it is a “Default Font” used everywhere and that wasn’t a coincidence.
It’s just… well… I don’t like serif fonts that much so I don’t use Times ever.
Btw, when can we expect that redesign? :)